Appendix D. Audit Act 1994 section 16—submissions and comments
Introduction
In accordance with section 16(3) of the Audit Act 1994, a copy of this report, or part of this report, was provided to the surveyed agencies listed in Appendix A, the Department of Premier & Cabinet, the Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board, VicTrack and RMIT University throughout the course of the audit.
Appendix C. Project status
Performance against budget and time lines
Figure C1 shows the performance against budget and time lines for 215 projects based on self-attested data provided in our survey of agencies.
Within approved time/budget |
|
Within six months of approved timeline or 5 per cent of approved budget |
Appendix B. Selected projects for examination of supporting documentation
Selected projects
Figure B1 lists the 15 capital projects, by agency, selected for a limited examination of supporting documentation.
Figure B1
Projects reviewed
Agency |
Project |
Budget $ million |
Actual $ million |
Project phase |
---|---|---|---|---|
Country Fire Authority |
Appendix A. Surveyed agencies
Agencies within scope
- Barwon Region Water Corporation
- Bendigo Kangan Institute
- Central Gippsland Region Water Corporation
- Chisholm Institute
- City West Water Corporation
- Coliban Region Water Corporation
- Country Fire Authority
- Court Services Victoria
- Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport & Resources
- Department of Education & Training
- Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning
- Department of Health & Human Services
- Department o
3 Review of supporting documentation
At a glance
Background
This part shows the results of a limited examination of the key project documentation, collected for a sample of 15 of the 251 projects, to verify its completeness and consistency with Department of Treasury & Finance's (DTF) Investment Lifecycle and High Value/High Risk Guidelines(lifecycle guidelines).
2 Analysis of capital projects survey
At a glance
Background
The Department of Treasury & Finance's (DTF) Investment Lifecycle and High Value/High Risk Guidelines (lifecycle guidelines) provide guidance to agencies on managing projects. This part examines agencies' survey responses relating to planning, governance, project management, procurement, post-implementation reviews and project costs and time lines.
1 Background
1.1 Introduction
The quality of life and economic success of any community is heavily influenced by the quality of its water supply, sewerage systems, roads, public transport, education facilities, health facilities, communications systems, communal facilities and recreational infrastructure.
Auditor-General's comments
Dr Peter Frost Acting Auditor-General |
Audit team Ray Winn and Michael Herbert—Engagement Leaders Rocco Rottura—Team Leader Hayley Svenson—Team member Engagement Quality Control Reviewer Tony Brown |
Transmittal letter
Ordered to be published
VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER June 2016
PP No 154, Session 2014-16
President
Legislative Council
Parliament House
Melbourne
Speaker
Legislative Assembly
Parliament House
Melbourne
Dear Presiding Officers