2. Monitoring compliance

Not all the audited councils are meeting all their obligations under the Food Act.

None of the audited councils consistently use active surveillance to find unregistered food premises. They are also not assessing or inspecting all food premises.

The councils are responsive to community complaints and provide procedural fairness. However, they could improve their recording and reporting of food safety complaints.

1. Audit context

Food safety is a critical aspect of public health and wellbeing. Worldwide, an estimated 600 million people fall ill each year after consuming contaminated food. An estimated 420,000 of those die. In Australia, approximately 4.7 million cases of foodborne illness cost the community $2.4 billion a year.

What we found

This section summarises our key findings for regulating food safety. Sections 2, 3 and 4 detail our complete findings, including supporting evidence.

The agencies we examined were the Department of Health (DH), City of Casey (Casey), City of Greater Geelong (Geelong), Hepburn Shire Council (Hepburn), City of Kingston (Kingston) and Manningham City Council (Manningham).

When reaching our conclusions, we consulted with the audited agencies and considered their views. The agencies’ full responses are in Appendix A.

3. Financial audit work program

We deliver a range of attest services to public sector agencies. We conduct financial audits in line with the Australian Auditing Standards and other relevant professional and legislative requirements.

Our financial audit scope

Sectors we audit

Our financial audit program covers entities across a range of sectors. 

Annual Plan 2023–24

Body
This annual plan sets out our proposed work program for the 2023–24 financial year.