Appendix A. Audit Act 1994 section 16—submissions and comments
Introduction
In accordance with section 16(3) of the Audit Act 1994, a copy of this report, or part of this report, was provided to Department of Treasury and Finance, the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport & Resources, VicRoads and Public Transport Victoria.
The submissions and comments provided are not subject to audit nor the evidentiary standards required to reach an audit conclusion. Responsibility for the accuracy, fairness and balance of those comments rests solely with the agency head.
Responses were received as follows:
4 Cranbourne Pakenham Rail Corridor project
At a glance
Background
This Part examines whether the High Value High Risk (HVHR) process has been effectively applied to the Cranbourne Pakenham Rail Corridor project (Cranbourne Pakenham) to provide rigorous and comprehensive advice to government about whether and how to proceed.
3 CityLink Tulla Widening project
At a glance
Background
This Part examines whether the High Value High Risk (HVHR) process has been effectively applied to the CityLink Tulla Widening project (CityLink Tulla) to provide rigorous and comprehensive advice to government about whether and how the proposal should proceed.
2 Integrating the HVHR and unsolicited proposal processes
At a glance
Background
This Part examines whether the Department of Treasury and Finance (DTF) has adequately responded to VAGO's June 2014 recommendation to advise government on including unsolicited proposals in the High Value High Risk (HVHR) process.
1 Background
1.1 Introduction
Effective infrastructure planning and delivery are critical to the state's future prosperity and liveability. Government introduced the High Value High Risk process (HVHR) to address systemic weaknesses undermining agencies' performance in developing and investing in major projects.
This Part of the report:
Auditor-General's comments
John Doyle Auditor-General |
Audit team Ray Winn—Engagement Leader Kate Kuring—Team Leader Sid Nair—Analyst Engagement Quality Control Reviewer Tony Brown |
Applying the High Value High Risk Process to Unsolicited Proposals: Message
Ordered to be published
VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER August 2015
PP No 75, Session 2014–15
Applying the High Value High Risk Process to Unsolicited Proposals
Appendix A. Audit Act 1994 section 16—submissions and comments
Introduction
In accordance with section 16(3) of the Audit Act 1994, a copy of this report, or part of this report, was provided to the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport & Resources and the Department of Health and Human Services.
The submissions and comments provided are not subject to audit nor the evidentiary standards required to reach an audit conclusion. Responsibility for the accuracy, fairness and balance of those comments rests solely with the agency head.