Appendix A. Audit Act 1994—section 16—submissions and comments

We have consulted with DJPR, and we considered their views when reaching our audit conclusions. As required by section 16(3) of the Audit Act 1994, we gave a draft copy of this report to those agencies and asked for their submissions and comments. We also provided a copy of the report to DPC.

Responsibility for the accuracy, fairness and balance of those comments rests solely with the agency head.

Responses were received as follows:

  • DJPR

RESPONSE provided by the Acting Secretary, DJPR

3 Delivering regional outcomes

In this part, we assess whether RDV can demonstrate the outcomes the grants it has administered have achieved in improving outcomes in regional Victoria.

We also highlight the way RDV could use available social and economic data to target fund expenditure to drive better outcomes for regional Victorians.

1 Audit context

1.1 Regional Victoria's role in the economy and community

Regional Victoria is home to 24 per cent of the state's population. In 2017–18 it produced 19 per cent of the state's GRP despite challenges such as low population and job growth.

Since 2005–06, regional Victoria has experienced negative GRP growth in six years and growth of less than 1 per cent in another four. The gap in GRP per person between regional Victoria and metropolitan Melbourne is increasing, as shown in Figure 1A.

Transmittal Letter

Ordered to be published

VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER September 2018

PP No 439, Session 2014–18

The Hon. Bruce Atkinson MLC
President
Legislative Council
Parliament House
Melbourne
 
The Hon Colin Brooks MP
Speaker
Legislative Assembly
Parliament House
Melbourne
 

Dear Presiding Officers