3. Accounts and records

Conclusion

DTF implemented effective internal controls to support the preparation of a complete and accurate AFR.

VicTrack has made significant progress in improving its internal control framework that relates to asset accounting.

The internal control frameworks of the other material entities were adequate to support preparation of complete and accurate financial reports. However, some entities need to strengthen some internal controls to ensure their financial reports remain reliable.

2. Financial outcomes for the GGS

Conclusion

The operating cash result turned around this year, with a surplus of $4.3 billion ($8.9 billion deficit in 2021–22). However, this includes the $7.9 billion proceeds from the VicRoads modernisation joint-venture arrangement. The GGS would have reported an operating cash deficit of $3.6 billion without this inflow. It also loses some of the future cash inflows from the registration and licensing activities that it controlled before the joint-venture arrangement.

1. Audit outcomes

Conclusion

Our clear opinion provides reasonable assurance that the financial performance and position of the State of Victoria, and within that the general government sector, as reported in the 2022–23 Annual Financial Report of the State of Victoria (AFR), is reliable.

Auditor-General’s Report on the Annual Financial Report of the State of Victoria: 2022–23

Body

The 2022–23 Annual Financial Report of the State of Victoria (AFR) is free from material errors and we issued an unmodified (clear) audit opinion on it.

Audit outcomes

We issued clear opinions on 28 of the 29 material entities’ financial reports.

We continue to modify our audit opinion on the financial report of Victorian Rail Track, because of how it accounts for assets it leases to the Department of Transport and Planning.

4. Monitoring and enforcing the law on asbestos disposal

Agencies can observe, inspect and investigate people and businesses involved with asbestos disposal to make sure they are complying with the law. They can also fine, warn, and take other actions against anyone who dumps asbestos.

But agencies do not coordinate their approach to monitoring and enforcement. The type and severity of compliance actions they take depends on where the asbestos was dumped, and which agency cleaned it up.

3. Making it easier to legally and safely dispose of asbestos

While information about how to safely remove and dispose of asbestos is widely available, it is not always complete.

This can make it difficult for people to know where to take asbestos. Different landfills and other collection points also have different costs and conditions for accepting asbestos. The lack of clarity can be confusing and could deter people from disposing of asbestos correctly.